Tucker v. Power

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tucker v. Power

362 S.W.3d 511, 2012 WL 1115349, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 448

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 3, 2012·No. ED 97194, ED 97229·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, and Timothy Tucker, the claimant in this workers’ compensation action, each appeal from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarding workers’ compensation benefits to claimant. The Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(4) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, and Timothy Tucker, the claimant in this workers’ compensation action, each appeal from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarding workers’ compensation benefits to claimant. The Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(4) & (5).

Tucker v. Power, 362 S.W.3d 511, 2012 WL 1115349, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 448 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

362 S.W.3d 511 (Tucker v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.