Tucker v. Power

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tucker v. Power

362 S.W.3d 511, 2012 WL 1115349, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 448

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 3, 2012

DocketED 97194, ED 97229

StatusPublished

This text of 362 S.W.3d 511 (Tucker v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker v. Power, 362 S.W.3d 511, 2012 WL 1115349, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 448 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, and Timothy Tucker, the claimant in this workers’ compensation action, each appeal from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarding workers’ compensation benefits to claimant. The Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(4) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, and Timothy Tucker, the claimant in this workers’ compensation action, each appeal from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarding workers’ compensation benefits to claimant. The Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(4) & (5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 S.W.3d 511, 2012 WL 1115349, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-power-moctapp-2012.