Tucker v. Pernell

50 A.D.2d 946, 377 N.Y.S.2d 188
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1975·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— In an action for a declaration as to which of the defendant insurers is obligated to defend a certain claim, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 29, 1975, as (1) denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment and (2) consolidated this action with a certain pending negligence action. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provisions consolidating the two actions and substituting therefor a provision that the two actions shall be tried jointly. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondents. In our opinion, the interests of all of the parties will best be served by a joint trial. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. Pernell, 50 A.D.2d 946, 377 N.Y.S.2d 188 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 946 (Tucker v. Pernell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelley v. Galina-Bouquet, Inc.
155 A.D.2d 96 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)