Tucker v. Norton
134 F.2d 172, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3512
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 1943
DocketNo. 8222
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 134 F.2d 172 (Tucker v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tucker v. Norton, 134 F.2d 172, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3512 (3d Cir. 1943).
Opinion
The order of the district court denying the plaintiff’s motion for an interlocutory injunction to stay the enforcement of the compensation award made by the defendant is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Kalodner, 47 F.Supp. 762.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Benefits Review Board
535 F.2d 758 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 F.2d 172, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-norton-ca3-1943.