Tucker v. Norton
134 F.2d 172, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3512
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 10, 1943·No. No. 8222·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The order of the district court denying the plaintiff’s motion for an interlocutory injunction to stay the enforcement of the compensation award made by the defendant is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Kalodner, 47 F.Supp. 762.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tucker v. Norton, 134 F.2d 172, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3512 (3d Cir. 1943).
134 F.2d 172 (Tucker v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Benefits Review Board
535 F.2d 758 (Third Circuit, 1976)