Tucker v. National Linen Service Corp.

188 F.2d 265
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 10, 1951·No. 13351_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

*266 HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

This appeal from a judgment dismissing for want of requisite diversity the stockholders derivative action, brought on behalf of Crescent City Laundries, Inc., presents fundamentally the same questions as are presented in the case of Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, 5 Cir., 188 F.2d 263.

Heard after the New Orleans case was heard and decided, the opinion and judgment of the district judge in this case followed and were based largely on the opinion and judgment there.

While in the course of his decision, the district judge did discuss and consider other matters, the decision on the diversity issue is dispositive of the case, and makes unnecessary our consideration of those matters.

It is sufficient to say that the decision in this case is controlled by that in the New Orleans case and that, for the reasons given in the affirmance of the judgment in that case, the judgment of dismissal in this case is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. National Linen Service Corp., 188 F.2d 265 (5th Cir. 1951).

188 F.2d 265 (Tucker v. National Linen Service Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc.
145 So. 2d 365 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1962)
Crawford v. Lydick
179 F. Supp. 211 (W.D. Michigan, 1959)
Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc.
114 So. 2d 866 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1959)
Smith v. Sperling
117 F. Supp. 781 (S.D. California, 1953)
Tucker v. National Linen Service Corp.
200 F.2d 858 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)