Tucker v. Moseley

156 S.E. 677, 171 Ga. 778, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 461
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 17, 1931
DocketNo. 7593
StatusPublished

This text of 156 S.E. 677 (Tucker v. Moseley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. Moseley, 156 S.E. 677, 171 Ga. 778, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 461 (Ga. 1931).

Opinion

Russell, O. J.

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. The assignments of error, so far ■ as sufficient to raise any question for decision, show no cause for reversal.of the judgment refusing the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

'Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 S.E. 677, 171 Ga. 778, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-moseley-ga-1931.