Tucker v. Moller

Second Circuit

Tucker v. Moller

445 F.2d 1400, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10828

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 1971

DocketNo. 716, Docket 35685

StatusPublished

This text of 445 F.2d 1400 (Tucker v. Moller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker v. Moller, 445 F.2d 1400, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10828 (2d Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, appeals from dismissal by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Judge, (D.Conn.1970) of his civil action against attorneys representing opposing parties in actions attacking the constitutionality of Connecticut attachment statutes. [1401]*1401We affirm on the opinion of Judge Blu-menfeld below, for lack of action “under color of state law” to base claims under the civil rights statutes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, appeals from dismissal by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Judge, (D.Conn.1970) of his civil action against attorneys representing opposing parties in actions attacking the constitutionality of Connecticut attachment statutes. [1401]*1401We affirm on the opinion of Judge Blu-menfeld below, for lack of action “under color of state law” to base claims under the civil rights statutes.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 F.2d 1400, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-moller-ca2-1971.