Tucker v. Mecklenburg Cty. Zoning Bd. of Adjust.
566 S.E.2d 483, 355 N.C. 758
Opinion
Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rulé 16 (b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 27 June 2002.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tucker v. Mecklenburg Cty. Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 566 S.E.2d 483, 355 N.C. 758 (N.C. 2002).
566 S.E.2d 483 (Tucker v. Mecklenburg Cty. Zoning Bd. of Adjust.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robertson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment for the City of Charlotte
605 S.E.2d 723 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Raleigh Rescue Mission, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment
571 S.E.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
In the Matter of Society for Preservation of Historic Oakwood
571 S.E.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)