Tucker v. Mecklenburg County Zoning Board of Adjustment
576 S.E.2d 324, 356 N.C. 658, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 39
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 28, 2003
DocketNo. 68A02
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 576 S.E.2d 324 (Tucker v. Mecklenburg County Zoning Board of Adjustment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tucker v. Mecklenburg County Zoning Board of Adjustment, 576 S.E.2d 324, 356 N.C. 658, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 39 (N.C. 2003).
Opinion
As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Campola
812 S.E.2d 681 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
Four Seasons Management Services, Inc. v. Town of Wrightsville Beach
695 S.E.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Templeton Properties LP v. TOWN OF BOONE
681 S.E.2d 566 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
MMR HOLDINGS, LLC. v. City of Charlotte
621 S.E.2d 210 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Robertson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment for the City of Charlotte
605 S.E.2d 723 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Jones v. Davis
594 S.E.2d 235 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Morris Communications Corp. v. Board of Adjustment for Gastonia
583 S.E.2d 419 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
576 S.E.2d 324, 356 N.C. 658, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-mecklenburg-county-zoning-board-of-adjustment-nc-2003.