Tucker v. Lea
This text of 58 S.E.2d 434 (Tucker v. Lea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Under Code § 3-601, no suitor may prosecute two actions in the courts at the same time, for the same cause, and against the same party; and if such suits are commenced at different times, the pendency of the former shall be a good defense to the latter. The petition showing that another suit which involved the same subject-matter (Mrs. Tucker’s answer in the nature of a cross-petition in Tucker v. American Surety Co. of N. Y., ante, 533), was pending at the time the present suit was filed, the court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer and in dismissing the action. See, in this connection, Bird v. Trapnell, 148 Ga. 301 (1) (96 S. E. 417); Cook v. State Highway Board, 162 Ga. 84 (3) (132 S. E. 902); Hines v. Moore, 168 Ga. 451 (8) (148 S. E. 162).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 S.E.2d 434, 206 Ga. 538, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-lea-ga-1950.