Tucker v. Lea

58 S.E.2d 434, 206 Ga. 538, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 563
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 1950
DocketNo. 16939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 S.E.2d 434 (Tucker v. Lea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. Lea, 58 S.E.2d 434, 206 Ga. 538, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 563 (Ga. 1950).

Opinions

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

Under Code § 3-601, no suitor may prosecute two actions in the courts at the same time, for the same cause, and against the same party; and if such suits are commenced at different times, the pendency of the former shall be a good defense to the latter. The petition showing that another suit which involved the same subject-matter (Mrs. Tucker’s answer in the nature of a cross-petition in Tucker v. American Surety Co. of N. Y., ante, 533), was pending at the time the present suit was filed, the court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer and in dismissing the action. See, in this connection, Bird v. Trapnell, 148 Ga. 301 (1) (96 S. E. 417); Cook v. State Highway Board, 162 Ga. 84 (3) (132 S. E. 902); Hines v. Moore, 168 Ga. 451 (8) (148 S. E. 162).

[539]*539No. 16939. February 16, 1950. Randall Evans Jr., for plaintiff. B. Lamar. Tillman, for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C. J., who dissents. Head, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dowling v. Pound
104 S.E.2d 465 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 S.E.2d 434, 206 Ga. 538, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-lea-ga-1950.