Tucker v. Johnson
This text of Tucker v. Johnson (Tucker v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7282
CORNELIUS A. TUCKER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
GENE M. JOHNSON,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00171-sgw-mfu)
Submitted: September 23, 2009 Decided: November 10, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornelius A. Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Cornelius A. Tucker appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for release on bail pending disposition of
his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Tucker v. Johnson,
No. 7:09-cv-00171-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. June 22, 2009). Tucker has
also moved in this court for release pending appeal; we deny the
motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tucker v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-johnson-ca4-2009.