Tucker v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Tucker v. Johnson

351 F. App'x 794

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 10, 2009·No. No. 09-7282·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius A. Tucker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for release on bail pending disposition of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tucker v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00171-sgw-mfu (W.D.Va. June 22, 2009). Tucker has also moved in this court for release pending appeal; we deny the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius A. Tucker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for release on bail pending disposition of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tucker v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00171-sgw-mfu (W.D.Va. June 22, 2009). Tucker has also moved in this court for release pending appeal; we deny the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Tucker v. Johnson, 351 F. App'x 794 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

351 F. App'x 794 (Tucker v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related