Tucker v. Gensberg

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Tucker v. Gensberg

173 A.2d 485

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 17, 1961·No. No. 2768·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant brought this action in the United States District Court for false arrest and imprisonment, assault, and slander. He asked $100,000 for compensatory and punitive damages. The case was certified to the Municipal Court for trial and re-[486] suited in a jury verdict for appellees. This appeal followed.

Twenty-three assignments of error are alleged, the majority of which are frivolous. We have carefully reviewed the voluminous transcript and find no basis for disturbing the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant brought this action in the United States District Court for false arrest and imprisonment, assault, and slander. He asked $100,000 for compensatory and punitive damages. The case was certified to the Municipal Court for trial and re-[486] suited in a jury verdict for appellees. This appeal followed.

Twenty-three assignments of error are alleged, the majority of which are frivolous. We have carefully reviewed the voluminous transcript and find no basis for disturbing the judgment.

Affirmed.

Tucker v. Gensberg, 173 A.2d 485 (D.C. 1961).

Pincite

173 A.2d 485 (Tucker v. Gensberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.