Tucker v. Geico Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Tucker v. Geico Casualty Co.

502 P.3d 788, 317 Or. App. 370

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 2, 2022·No. A175278·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Submitted January 5, affirmed February 2, 2022

Demetrius TUCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, a Maryland corporation, Defendant-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CV45728; A175278 502 P3d 788

David F. Rees, Judge. Merkel & Associates and Willard E. Merkel filed the briefs for appellant. Brian C. Hickman, Elaine J. Brown and Gordon & Polscer, LLC filed the brief for respondent. Before Mooney, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Chief Judge, and DeHoog, Judge pro tempore. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Koenig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 315 Or App 28, 500 P3d 68 (2021).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted January 5, affirmed February 2, 2022

Demetrius TUCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, a Maryland corporation, Defendant-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CV45728; A175278 502 P3d 788

David F. Rees, Judge. Merkel & Associates and Willard E. Merkel filed the briefs for appellant. Brian C. Hickman, Elaine J. Brown and Gordon & Polscer, LLC filed the brief for respondent. Before Mooney, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Chief Judge, and DeHoog, Judge pro tempore. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Koenig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 315 Or App 28, 500 P3d 68 (2021).

Tucker v. Geico Casualty Co., 502 P.3d 788, 317 Or. App. 370 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

502 P.3d 788 (Tucker v. Geico Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related