Tucker v. Geico Casualty Co.

502 P.3d 788, 317 Or. App. 370
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 2, 2022
DocketA175278
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 502 P.3d 788 (Tucker v. Geico Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. Geico Casualty Co., 502 P.3d 788, 317 Or. App. 370 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Submitted January 5, affirmed February 2, 2022

Demetrius TUCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, a Maryland corporation, Defendant-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CV45728; A175278 502 P3d 788

David F. Rees, Judge. Merkel & Associates and Willard E. Merkel filed the briefs for appellant. Brian C. Hickman, Elaine J. Brown and Gordon & Polscer, LLC filed the brief for respondent. Before Mooney, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Chief Judge, and DeHoog, Judge pro tempore. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Koenig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 315 Or App 28, 500 P3d 68 (2021).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graves v. Matteucci
502 P.3d 788 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 P.3d 788, 317 Or. App. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-geico-casualty-co-orctapp-2022.