Tucker v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

417 So. 2d 1178, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28688
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 1982·No. No. 81-635·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner’s request for a writ of habeas corpus was denied by the circuit court, which held that it had no jurisdiction over the Florida Parole and Probation Commission’s determination of his release date. However, according to our decision in Lowe v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm’n, 416 So.2d 470 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 30, 1982), the circuit court did have jurisdiction to review the commission’s action and provide relief if the prisoner demonstrated entitlement thereto.

We therefore reverse and remand for an appropriate determination, pursuant to Lowe.

OTT, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHOON-OVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 417 So. 2d 1178, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28688 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

417 So. 2d 1178 (Tucker v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowe v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COMM.
416 So. 2d 470 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)