Tucker v. Ellis (In re Ellis)

507 B.R. 9
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia
DecidedFebruary 25, 2014
DocketBankruptcy No. 13-65910-MHM; Adversary No. 13-5377
StatusPublished

This text of 507 B.R. 9 (Tucker v. Ellis (In re Ellis)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. Ellis (In re Ellis), 507 B.R. 9 (Ga. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

MARGARET H. MURPHY, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff filed a complaint initiating this adversary proceeding October 23, 2013. No response was filed, and Plaintiff requested entry of default January 6, 2014 [10]*10(Doc. No. 6). On January 13, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 7) (the “Motion”). Plaintiff now seeks default judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted.

Plaintiffs undisputed allegations show that Debtor’s debt to Plaintiff — specifically, a $9,745.50 judgement entered in the Magistrate Court of DeKalb County, Georgia — arose from “malicious and willful theft by the defendant.” Plaintiff asserts that Debtor stole an engagement ring from Plaintiff.

Under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6), debts arising from “willful and malicious injury” are excepted from § 727 discharge. “A debtor is responsible for a ‘willful’ injury when he or she commits an intentional act ... which is substantially likely to cause injury.” Hope v. Walker, 48 F.3d 1161, 1165 (11th Cir.1995). Loss of property is among the types of “injury” contemplated by § 523(a)(6). Cf. In re Wolfson, 56 F.3d 52, 54 (11th Cir.1995) (“Willful and malicious injury includes willful and malicious conversionf.]”)

Debtor also requests costs and fees associated with bringing this proceeding. Under the “American Rule” each party to a legal proceeding is generally responsible for his or her own fees and expenses. Johnson v. Florida, 348 F.3d 1334, 1350 (11th Cir.2003). Generally, statutory authority is required for departure from the American Rule. Id. Plaintiff has not pointed to any such authority excepting this proceeding from the American Rule. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for default judgment is granted: the $9,745.50 judgement entered in the Magistrate Court of DeKalb County, Georgia is non-dischargeable under § 523(a)(6). It is further

ORDERED that each party is responsible for its own fees and costs associated with this proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolfson v. Equine Capital Corp.
56 F.3d 52 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Johnson v. State of FL
348 F.3d 1334 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
507 B.R. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-ellis-in-re-ellis-ganb-2014.