Tucker v. Davis
This text of 15 Ga. 573 (Tucker v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
There ajp three points made in the bill of exceptions. It is only necessary to consider one of them.
Here, then, there is a stipulation omitted, namely: that the principal may discharge the obligation, by paying the debt, which is for the benefit of the bail; and one is inserted, which is not authorized, and which is prejudicial to the bail, namely: that upon failure of the principal, to surrender his body, that the bail will do it. The law imposes no such duty; he may discharge himself, by surrendering his principal to the jail or Sheriff; he is not bound to do so.
Now, the doctrine is this: if a bond contains a condition not required by the law, but which is beneficial to the security, it does not vitiate the bond; but if a condition is inserted, not [575]*575warranted by the law, and which is onerous to the security, or omits one for his benefit, the instrument is void.
The application of these tests, to this paper, is fatal to it.
We are constrained, therefore, to reverse the judgment below, and send the cause back, with directions to enter a non-suit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ga. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-davis-ga-1854.