Tucker v. Clinton
This text of 59 F.3d 167 (Tucker v. Clinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bill CLINTON, President; J.B. French, Warden; Sergeant
Grimes; L.C. Phillips, Director, Ncdop; Judge
Fox, Chief; James B. Hunt, Governor,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6233.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying leave to file a complaint pursuant to a pre-filing injunction and denying Appellant's motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Clinton, No. CA-94-160-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 1994; Feb. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23482, 1995 WL 373275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-clinton-ca4-1995.