Tucker v. City of Sebring

161 So. 278, 119 Fla. 256, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 963

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 7, 1935·Published

Opinions

*257 Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of Hope-rich v. City of Sebring, in which opinion was filed at this term of the Court.

The judgment should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., concurs' in the conclusion. Brown, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*257 Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of Hope-rich v. City of Sebring, in which opinion was filed at this term of the Court.

The judgment should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., concurs' in the conclusion. Brown, J., concurs specially.

Tucker v. City of Sebring, 161 So. 278, 119 Fla. 256, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 963 (Fla. 1935).

Pincite

161 So. 278 (Tucker v. City of Sebring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.