Tucker v. Charpentier
This text of 28 La. Ann. 617 (Tucker v. Charpentier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants were indebted to the plaintiff for the amount of a promissory note which he held, the note being executed by the defendants. The defendants gave him a draft drawn by a planting partnership on the house of T. H. & J. M. Allen & Oo. in settlement of his claim. The draft was not paid. He brings this suit to recover the amount of the note.
The defense is that the draft was given and received in payment of the note, and therefore that the note was extinguished.
The receipt reads that the draft “ when paid” should destroy the note.The draft not being paid, the receipt amounted to nothing, and left the note due and unpaid.
There is no error in the judgment which compelled its payment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 La. Ann. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-charpentier-la-1876.