Tucker v. Byers

21 S.W. 227, 57 Ark. 215, 1893 Ark. LEXIS 69
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 28, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 21 S.W. 227 (Tucker v. Byers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. Byers, 21 S.W. 227, 57 Ark. 215, 1893 Ark. LEXIS 69 (Ark. 1893).

Opinion

Cockriee, C. J.

Viewing the facts in the lig'ht of the appellant’s abstract, the statements of which the appellee has not seen fit to controvert, the case stands thus :

The appellee purchased the appellant’s land at execution sale, and, after obtaining a deed in pursuance of the sale, brought suit against the appellant before a justice of the peace, and sued out an attachment, under the landlord’s lien act, to recover" the rent of the land. Upon that state of facts, no cause of the action ex contractu arises. To justify the recovery of rents, the relation of landlord and tenant must exist, and that relation depends upon contract, express or implied. But there is no implied promise on the part of a judgment debtor, whose land has been sold under execution, to hold as a tenant of the purchaser.

The judgment of the circuit court in favor of the appellee will be reversed, and the caused remanded. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelly v. Weir
243 F. Supp. 588 (E.D. Arkansas, 1965)
J. H. Askew Company v. Lindsey
289 S.W. 769 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1927)
Love v. Cahn
124 S.W. 259 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.W. 227, 57 Ark. 215, 1893 Ark. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-byers-ark-1893.