Tucker v. Brucker
251 F.2d 898, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 187
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 1958
DocketNos. 13876, 13877
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 251 F.2d 898 (Tucker v. Brucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tucker v. Brucker, 251 F.2d 898, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 187 (D.C. Cir. 1958).
Opinion
We think the District Court erred in awarding summary judgments in these cases to the defendants, and dismissing the complaints, on the ground of laches. Duncan v. Summerfield, 102 U.S.App.D.C.-, 251 F.2d 896.
Reversed and remanded.
BASTIAN, Circuit Judge, dissents, believing that the actions are barred by laches.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jones v. Summerfield
265 F.2d 124 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
251 F.2d 898, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-brucker-cadc-1958.