Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Tucker v. Bivins

Tucker v. Bivins

162 S.E. 151, 44 Ga. App. 535, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 364
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 12, 1932·No. 21360·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

This is the third appearance of this case in this court. See Bivins v. Tucker, 41 Ga. App. 771 (154 S. E. 820), 42 Ga. App. 254 (155 S. E. 532). Upon the principles there ruled, and previously ruled in Tallent v. Crim, 19 Ga. App. 16 (90 S. E. 742), the petition as finally amended was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Dowling & Dowling, for plaintiff. P. Q. Bryan, Marlin L-. Bivins, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. Bivins, 162 S.E. 151, 44 Ga. App. 535, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 364 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

162 S.E. 151 (Tucker v. Bivins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tallent v. Crim
90 S.E. 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Bivins v. Tucker
154 S.E. 820 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Arnold v. Brown
155 S.E. 532 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Bivins v. Tucker
155 S.E. 533 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)