Tucker v. Bivins

162 S.E. 151, 44 Ga. App. 535, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 364
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1932
Docket21360
StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 151 (Tucker v. Bivins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. Bivins, 162 S.E. 151, 44 Ga. App. 535, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 364 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Luke, J.

This is the third appearance of this case in this court. See Bivins v. Tucker, 41 Ga. App. 771 (154 S. E. 820), 42 Ga. App. 254 (155 S. E. 532). Upon the principles there ruled, and previously ruled in Tallent v. Crim, 19 Ga. App. 16 (90 S. E. 742), the petition as finally amended was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Dowling & Dowling, for plaintiff. P. Q. Bryan, Marlin L-. Bivins, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tallent v. Crim
90 S.E. 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Bivins v. Tucker
154 S.E. 820 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Arnold v. Brown
155 S.E. 532 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Bivins v. Tucker
155 S.E. 533 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 151, 44 Ga. App. 535, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-bivins-gactapp-1932.