Tucker v. Bessee

95 So. 2d 420, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3459
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 So. 2d 420 (Tucker v. Bessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. Bessee, 95 So. 2d 420, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3459 (Fla. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and Briefs of Counsel in this cause, and heard oral argument at the Bar of this Court. From our perusal of the record we reach the conclusion that the Chancellor below based his findings upon conflicting evidence, and following the rule so often enunciated by this Court, that “the findings of a Chancellor, based upon conflicting evidence, will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to be erroneous”, and finding no reversible error , in the record we conclude that the cause should be, and it is, hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., and WELCH, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanover Realty Corp. v. Codomo
95 So. 2d 420 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 2d 420, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-bessee-fla-1957.