Tucker v. AMCO Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 17, 2020·No. 1:17-cv-01761·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 JENNIFER MARIE TUCKER, No. 1:17-cv-01761-DAD-SKO

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, and Does 1 through 25, inclusive, (Doc. 49) 15 16 Defendants. 17

18 On March 16, 2020, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 19 prejudice. (Doc. 49.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 20 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 21 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22

24 Sheila K. Oberto Dated: March 16, 2020 /s/ . 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. AMCO Insurance Company, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Tucker v. AMCO Insurance Company (Tucker v. AMCO Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)