Tucker & Goodheart v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Tucker & Goodheart v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 266, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 133

United States Customs Court·Decided February 19, 1948·No. No. 52184; protest 944805-G (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats composed of manila hemp, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, similar in all material respects to those the classification of which was involved in United States v. Armand Schwab (30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), the claim’ of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats composed of manila hemp, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, similar in all material respects to those the classification of which was involved in United States v. Armand Schwab (30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), the claim’ of the plaintiff was sustained.

Tucker & Goodheart v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 266, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 133 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

20 Cust. Ct. 266 (Tucker & Goodheart v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.