Tucker & Goodheart v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Tucker & Goodheart v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 266, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 133

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 19, 1948

DocketNo. 52184; protest 944805-G (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cust. Ct. 266 (Tucker & Goodheart v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker & Goodheart v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 266, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 133 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats composed of manila hemp, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, similar in all material respects to those the classification of which was involved in United States v. Armand Schwab (30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), the claim’ of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats composed of manila hemp, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, similar in all material respects to those the classification of which was involved in United States v. Armand Schwab (30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), the claim’ of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Cust. Ct. 266, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-goodheart-v-united-states-cusc-1948.