Tuck v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Tuck v. Tucker

417 S.E.2d 154, 262 Ga. 228

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 21, 1992

DocketS92A0354

StatusPublished

This text of 417 S.E.2d 154 (Tuck v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tuck v. Tucker, 417 S.E.2d 154, 262 Ga. 228 (Ga. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

The trial court’s retroactive application of the 1990 amendment to the Georgia Constitution eliminating the waiver of the defense of sovereign immunity by the acquisition of liability insurance, was error under Donaldson v. Dept. of Transp., 262 Ga. 49 (414 SE2d 638) (1992), and must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. [229]*229Decided May 21, 1992. J. Curtis Hanks, for appellant. John E. Underwood, Bentley, Karesh & Seacrest, Stephen D. Apolinsky, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, Margaret Ann Murphy, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The trial court’s retroactive application of the 1990 amendment to the Georgia Constitution eliminating the waiver of the defense of sovereign immunity by the acquisition of liability insurance, was error under Donaldson v. Dept. of Transp., 262 Ga. 49 (414 SE2d 638) (1992), and must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. [229]*229Decided May 21, 1992. J. Curtis Hanks, for appellant. John E. Underwood, Bentley, Karesh & Seacrest, Stephen D. Apolinsky, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, Margaret Ann Murphy, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 S.E.2d 154, 262 Ga. 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuck-v-tucker-ga-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack