Tuck v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Tuck v. State

203 S.W.2d 221

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 11, 1947

DocketNo. 23759

StatusPublished

This text of 203 S.W.2d 221 (Tuck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tuck v. State, 203 S.W.2d 221 (Tex. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the penitentiary for life.

Under proper allegations in the indictment, the appellant was found guilty of the primary offense of burglary. In addition thereto, the jury found that he had twice theretofore been convicted of a felony less than capital, and therefore assessed his punishment as above stated.

All matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the penitentiary for life.

Under proper allegations in the indictment, the appellant was found guilty of the primary offense of burglary. In addition thereto, the jury found that he had twice theretofore been convicted of a felony less than capital, and therefore assessed his punishment as above stated.

All matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 S.W.2d 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuck-v-state-texcrimapp-1947.