Tucholski v. Zielenski

248 A.D. 910, 291 N.Y.S. 406, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8043

This text of 248 A.D. 910 (Tucholski v. Zielenski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucholski v. Zielenski, 248 A.D. 910, 291 N.Y.S. 406, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order in so far as it denies plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment affirmed, and in so far as it grants the cross-motion of defendant George W. Brush & Son, Inc., for the same relief and determines that its mortgage take precedence over plaintiffs’ mortgage reversed on the law, without costs, and the [911]*911motion denied, without costs. There are questions of fact and law to be determined. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 910, 291 N.Y.S. 406, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucholski-v-zielenski-nyappdiv-1936.