Tucholski v. Zielenski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tucholski v. Zielenski

248 A.D. 910, 291 N.Y.S. 406, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8043

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order in so far as it denies plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment affirmed, and in so far as it grants the cross-motion of defendant George W. Brush & Son, Inc., for the same relief and determines that its mortgage take precedence over plaintiffs’ mortgage reversed on the law, without costs, and the [911]*911motion denied, without costs. There are questions of fact and law to be determined. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order in so far as it denies plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment affirmed, and in so far as it grants the cross-motion of defendant George W. Brush & Son, Inc., for the same relief and determines that its mortgage take precedence over plaintiffs’ mortgage reversed on the law, without costs, and the [911]*911motion denied, without costs. There are questions of fact and law to be determined. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Tucholski v. Zielenski, 248 A.D. 910, 291 N.Y.S. 406, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 910 (Tucholski v. Zielenski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.