Tuccicaselli v. Hernandez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tuccicaselli v. Hernandez

576 So. 2d 438, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2529, 1991 WL 40052

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 27, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1055

StatusPublished

This text of 576 So. 2d 438 (Tuccicaselli v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tuccicaselli v. Hernandez, 576 So. 2d 438, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2529, 1991 WL 40052 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, appearing pro se, filed an appeal of the decision of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit court. Because the circuit court was acting in its appellate capacity, we treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(3)(b)(2)(b); City of Ft. Lauderdale v. Couts, 239 So.2d 874 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

We deny the petition for writ of certiora-ri, finding no merit to the petitioner’s arguments.

HERSEY, C.J., POLEN, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, appearing pro se, filed an appeal of the decision of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit court. Because the circuit court was acting in its appellate capacity, we treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(3)(b)(2)(b); City of Ft. Lauderdale v. Couts, 239 So.2d 874 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

We deny the petition for writ of certiora-ri, finding no merit to the petitioner’s arguments.

HERSEY, C.J., POLEN, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

576 So. 2d 438, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2529, 1991 WL 40052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuccicaselli-v-hernandez-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack