Tubular Textile MacHinery Corporation v. Redman
This text of 267 F.2d 784 (Tubular Textile MacHinery Corporation v. Redman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TUBULAR TEXTILE MACHINERY CORPORATION, Appellant, and
Joseph Cohn and Eugene Cohn, Intervenors-Appellants,
v.
Frank R. REDMAN and Redman Process American Corporation, Appellees.
No. 353.
Docket 25698.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued June 10, 1959.
Decided June 22, 1959.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Richard H. Levet, Judge.
Harold H. Levin, New York City (Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, John Vaughan Groner, and Marvin E. Frankel, New York City, on the brief), for appellants.
Telford Taylor, of Taylor, Scoll & Simon, New York City (Taylor, Scoll & Simon, Kenneth Simon, and John Lowenthal, New York City, on the brief), for appellees.
Before HINCKS and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
On the grounds stated in the comprehensive opinion below, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1959, 173 F.Supp. 269.
The order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 F.2d 784, 122 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 52, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tubular-textile-machinery-corporation-v-redman-ca2-1959.