Tubbs v. Sather

149 N.W. 567, 29 N.D. 84, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 10
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided November 30, 1914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Fisk, J.

Motion by respondent to strike appellant’s record from the files, and for a dismissal of the appeal. Such motion is based upon the affidavit of one of respondent’s attorneys, the certificate of the clerk of the district court, and the records and files in the action. In opposition to the motion, appellant has produced an affidavit of his counsel.

The only ground of the motion which we need specially notice is in substance that appellant is in no manner aggrieved by the order appealed from.

Such order was made on November 22, 1910, and is as follows, omitting the title:

In the above-entitled action, the property mentioned in the judgment having been returned to plaintiff by defendant, and defendant having paid the costs in the action and demanded a release of said judgment, and the' plaintiff having insisted on the collection of the money judgment, and refused to receive the property therein mentioned tendered him by the defendant, . ...

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered that upon the delivery of the horse in question by defendant to plaintiff, or a tender thereof made, and proof of such tender or delivery being filed with the clerk, satisfying him that the same has been done, the clerk of this court is directed, to, on defendant’s demand, thereafter to satisfy said judgment of record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tubbs v. Sather, 149 N.W. 567, 29 N.D. 84, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 10 (N.D. 1914).

149 N.W. 567 (Tubbs v. Sather) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. Beverage
209 P. 1102 (Washington Supreme Court, 1922)
Currie v. Frazier
186 N.W. 244 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1921)
Tubbs v. Sather
158 N.W. 276 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)