Tubberville v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
This text of Tubberville v. Social Security Administration Commissioner (Tubberville v. Social Security Administration Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION CHRISTOPHER TUBBERVILLE PLAINTIFF
v. CIVIL NO. 23-6092
MARTIN J. O’MALLEY,! Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT JUDGMENT For reasons stated in a memorandum opinion of this date, the Court hereby reverses the decision of the Commissioner, and remands this case for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties have sixty days from entry of the judgment on the docket in which to appeal. If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" 1.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 6th day of February 2024.
/s/ sty. Comatock HON. CHRISTY COMSTOCK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
' Martin J. O’Malley, has been appointed to serve as Commissioner of Social Security Ad, and 1s substituted as Defendant, pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tubberville v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tubberville-v-social-security-administration-commissioner-arwd-2024.