Tubb v. State Ex Rel. Hogue

92 So. 922, 207 Ala. 715
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 20, 1922·No. 2 Div. 778.·Published

Opinion

SATRE, J.

The decree will he reversed, because no note of testimony was made. Crews v. State, 89 South. 205. 1 Observations on the merits of the cause will be omitted until the court can know the testimony on which any future decree is based. Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.
1

206 Ala. 101.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tubb v. State Ex Rel. Hogue, 92 So. 922, 207 Ala. 715 (Ala. 1922).

92 So. 922 (Tubb v. State Ex Rel. Hogue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crews v. State Ex Rel. Patterson
89 So. 205 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)