Tuan Dang v. Tamara S. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 27, 2021·No. 14-21-00016-CV·Published

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 27, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00016-CV

TUAN DANG, Appellant

V. TAMARA S. PATTERSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-73529

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed March 12, 2020. No post-judgment motion was filed. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed January 8, 2021.

The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is signed when appellant has not filed a timely post-judgment motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.

On March 29, 2021, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tuan Dang v. Tamara S. Patterson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Tuan Dang v. Tamara S. Patterson (Tuan Dang v. Tamara S. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)