Tuakalau v. United States

District Court, D. Utah·Decided April 14, 2023·No. 2:16-cv-00714·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

JOHN TUAKALAU,

Petitioner, ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION

v.

Civil Case No. 2:16-cv-714-TC Criminal Case No. 2:08-cr-431-TC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Judge: Tena Campbell Respondent.

On June 24, 2020, Petitioner John Tuakalau filed an amended motion to vacate his conviction and correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). The Tenth Circuit has now held that Hobbs Act robbery is categorically a crime of violence under the elements clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). United States v. Baker, 49 F.4th 1348 (10th Cir. 2022). Mr. Tuakalau’s claims under Davis are therefore foreclosed. ORDER The court DENIES Mr. Tuakalau’s Amended Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Court (ECF No. 9). SO ORDERED this 14th day of April, 2023. BY THE COURT:

TENA CAMPBELL U.S. District Court Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tuakalau v. United States, (D. Utah 2023).

Tuakalau v. United States (Tuakalau v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Davis
588 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 2019)
United States v. Baker
49 F.4th 1348 (Tenth Circuit, 2022)