Tua v. Modern Homes, Inc.
165 A.2d 798, 33 N.J. 476, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 178
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Price in the court below.
Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Sohettino vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the minority opinion of Judge Eoley.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub:, and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis and Pboctob — 4.
For reversal — Justices Hall and Sohettino — •2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tua v. Modern Homes, Inc., 165 A.2d 798, 33 N.J. 476, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 178 (N.J. 1960).
165 A.2d 798 (Tua v. Modern Homes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
TREVEJO v. WALMART
D. New Jersey, 2020
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Finch v. Pers
842 F. Supp. 78 (S.D. New York, 1994)