Tu (Long) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LONG NGOC TU, No. 79932 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILE CLARK,
DEC 1 3 2019
Respondent,
ELIZABETH A. BROWN
and CLERK OFNPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEVADA, By 6 N4004-4--vuoi--• DEPUTY CLERK
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
In this original pro se petition for a writ of certiorari and motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, petitioner appears to challenge the fairness of the proceedings below, including being held in jail after allegedly violating the conditions of house arrest while released on bail.
Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 844 (2004) (Petitioned j cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Gibbons
PieklA Wr
y J.
I Ac, zt\ , J.
Pickering Hardesty
cc: Long Ngoc Tu
Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A *Vv.
2
r- k
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tu (Long) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Tu (Long) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.