T&T Investment Corp v. Watkins, APC CPA and Jacob Watkins

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 4, 2021·No. 2020CW1188·Unknown

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

T& T INVESTMENT CORP NO. 2020 CW 1188 VERSUS WATKINS APC CPA AND JACOB MARCH 4, 2021 WATKINS

In Re: Watkins APC CPA and Jacob Watkins, applying for supervisory writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 187922.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, McCLENDON, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relators, Watkins, APC CPA and Jacob Watkins, failed to include a copy of the judgment complained of, in violation of Rule 4- S( C) ( 6) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Relators included a judgment that denied an

exception of no cause of action, but the ruling at issue is the denial of an exception of peremption, and the writ application

failed to include a judgment as to that exception.

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an

application for rehearing will not be considered. Rules 2- 18. 7 4- 9, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.

In the event relators seek to file a new application with this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation including the missing items noted herein, and must comply with

Rule 2- 12. 2, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts Appeal. of Any new application must be filed on or before March 29, 2021, and

must contain a copy of this ruling.

JMG

PMC WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

D PUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

T&T Investment Corp v. Watkins, APC CPA and Jacob Watkins, (La. Ct. App. 2021).

T&T Investment Corp v. Watkins, APC CPA and Jacob Watkins (T&T Investment Corp v. Watkins, APC CPA and Jacob Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.