Tsukasa Kiyono and Tomoe Kiyono v. Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States, and as Successor of the Alien Property Custodian
This text of 228 F.2d 462 (Tsukasa Kiyono and Tomoe Kiyono v. Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States, and as Successor of the Alien Property Custodian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By a notice of dismissal filed by the plaintiffs, pursuant to an agreement of settlement, a complaint for recovery of property vested by the Alien Property Custodian was dismissed with prejudice. Rule 41(a) (1), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. [28 U.S.C.A.]. The plaintiffs afterwards moved to set aside the dismissal and reinstate the case on the calendar. They now appeal from an order denying this motion. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 F.2d 462, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsukasa-kiyono-and-tomoe-kiyono-v-tom-c-clark-attorney-general-of-the-cadc-1955.