Tsukasa Kiyono and Tomoe Kiyono v. Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States, and as Successor of the Alien Property Custodian
228 F.2d 462, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 115
Opinion
By a notice of dismissal filed by the plaintiffs, pursuant to an agreement of settlement, a complaint for recovery of property vested by the Alien Property Custodian was dismissed with prejudice. Rule 41(a) (1), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. [28 U.S.C.A.]. The plaintiffs afterwards moved to set aside the dismissal and reinstate the case on the calendar. They now appeal from an order denying this motion. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tsukasa Kiyono and Tomoe Kiyono v. Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States, and as Successor of the Alien Property Custodian, 228 F.2d 462, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 115 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
228 F.2d 462 (Tsukasa Kiyono and Tomoe Kiyono v. Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States, and as Successor of the Alien Property Custodian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jerome Clarke v. United States
228 F.2d 462 (D.C. Circuit, 1955)