Tsoukanov v. Ashcroft
This text of 57 F. App'x 350 (Tsoukanov v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Valeri Peter Tsoukanov, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U. S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual determinations concerning a petitioner’s eligibility for asylum, and must uphold them unless the evidence compels a contrary result. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812,117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition.
Tsoukanov testified that he fears the Soviets may return to power and punish him for his participation in the Estonian People’s Front, an anti-Soviet organization with which he was involved in 1987. This evidence does not compel the conclusion that Tsoukanov has a well-founded fear of future persecution. See Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir.1995). Accordingly, Tsoukanov is not eligible for asylum.
Tsoukanov, in failing to qualify for asylum, necessarily failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425, 1429 (9th Cir.1995).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F. App'x 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsoukanov-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.