Tsoukalas v. Cacoulidis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tsoukalas v. Cacoulidis

74 A.D.2d 826, 425 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10573

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 826 (Tsoukalas v. Cacoulidis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tsoukalas v. Cacoulidis, 74 A.D.2d 826, 425 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover unpaid wages, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 22, 1979, which denied their motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement made October 18, 1978 in open court and to restore the action to the Trial Calendar. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The record indicates that no good cause exists for relieving plaintiffs of the terms of the stipulation of settlement. The failure of defendants to make any installment payments pursuant to the stipulation, which provided for entry of judgment for the full unpaid balance of the settlement sum, with costs and interest from date of settlement, in the event of such default, is insufficient to warrant relief from the stipulation on the grounds of fraud or bad faith. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover unpaid wages, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 22, 1979, which denied their motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement made October 18, 1978 in open court and to restore the action to the Trial Calendar. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The record indicates that no good cause exists for relieving plaintiffs of the terms of the stipulation of settlement. The failure of defendants to make any installment payments pursuant to the stipulation, which provided for entry of judgment for the full unpaid balance of the settlement sum, with costs and interest from date of settlement, in the event of such default, is insufficient to warrant relief from the stipulation on the grounds of fraud or bad faith. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 826, 425 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsoukalas-v-cacoulidis-nyappdiv-1980.