Tsotakos v. TSE Group, LLC

2021 NY Slip Op 00822, 191 A.D.3d 495, 138 N.Y.S.3d 299
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 2021
DocketIndex No. 159763/17 Appeal No. 13064 Case No. 2020-00854
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 00822 (Tsotakos v. TSE Group, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tsotakos v. TSE Group, LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op 00822, 191 A.D.3d 495, 138 N.Y.S.3d 299 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Tsotakos v TSE Group, LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 00822)
Tsotakos v TSE Group, LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 00822
Decided on February 09, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: February 09, 2021
Before: Renwick, J.P., Kern, Mazzarelli, Oing, JJ.

Index No. 159763/17 Appeal No. 13064 Case No. 2020-00854

[*1]Nancy Tsotakos, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

TSE Group, LLC, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.


Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd., New York (Carla Varriale of counsel), for appellants.

Roura & Melamed, New York (Alexander J. Wulwick of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered January 10, 2020, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied in this action where plaintiff was injured when she fell on an interior staircase in defendant's premises, since defendant failed to show that it lacked constructive notice of the defect on the step. Its manager testified that the photographs taken about a month after the accident accurately represented the condition on the steps before and on the day of the accident, and that they showed a "bunched up" and "lifted" condition at the edge of the step. Accordingly, a jury could reasonably conclude that the condition existed for a sufficient period of time for defendant to have discovered and remedied it, and that the condition was not trivial (see Latif v Eugene Smilovic Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc., 147 AD3d 507 [1st Dept 2017]; Tomaino v 209 E. 84th St. Corp., 72 AD3d 460, 460-461 [1st Dept 2010]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: February 9, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Latif v. Eugene Smilovic Housing Development Fund Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 1164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Tomaino v. 209 East 84th Street Corp.
72 A.D.3d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 00822, 191 A.D.3d 495, 138 N.Y.S.3d 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsotakos-v-tse-group-llc-nyappdiv-2021.