Tsivis v. Condilis Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tsivis v. Condilis Co.

99 S.E. 137, 23 Ga. App. 643, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 257

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 19, 1919

Docket10212

StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E. 137 (Tsivis v. Condilis Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tsivis v. Condilis Co., 99 S.E. 137, 23 Ga. App. 643, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 257 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence demanded the verdict, and the newly discovered evidence, in view of the trial judge’s note, does not require a new trial. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Complaint; from city court of Savannah—Judge, Freeman. September 17, 1918.

Robert L. Colding H. Mercer Jordan, for plaintiff in error. H. P. Gobb, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI