Tsitsera v. Hudson Transit Corp.

200 N.E.2d 633, 14 N.Y.2d 855, 251 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1056
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 1964·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, and the complaints in actions Nos. 2 and 3 dismissed upon the ground that the trial court erred as matter of law in failing to grant defendants-appellants ’ motion for a directed verdict. Since the evidence as to the circumstances surrounding the happening of the accident which damaged plaintiffs is undisputed, the question as to whether any act or omission of defendants-appellants was a proximate cause thereof was one for the court and not for the jury (Rivera v. City of New York, 11 N Y 2d 856).

Concur: Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi. Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Bergan dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tsitsera v. Hudson Transit Corp., 200 N.E.2d 633, 14 N.Y.2d 855, 251 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1056 (N.Y. 1964).

200 N.E.2d 633 (Tsitsera v. Hudson Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thorndike v. Coombes
63 A.D.2d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
In Re Ira Haupt & Company
304 F. Supp. 917 (S.D. New York, 1969)