Tsimmer v. Quarantillo
This text of 353 F. App'x 661 (Tsimmer v. Quarantillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellant Leo Tsimmer (“Tsimmer”) appeals from a final judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McMahon, J.) on April 25, 2008, dismissing Tsimmer’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.
In our review of a dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we review the District Court’s factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo. Wake v. United States, 89 F.3d 53, 57 (2d Cir.1996).
[662]*662We AFFIRM for the substantive reasons detailed in the District Court’s opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 F. App'x 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsimmer-v-quarantillo-ca2-2009.