Tsikis v. Pantelides

104 A.D.3d 841, 961 N.Y.S.2d 298

This text of 104 A.D.3d 841 (Tsikis v. Pantelides) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tsikis v. Pantelides, 104 A.D.3d 841, 961 N.Y.S.2d 298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated September 2, 2011, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[842]*842Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On April 11, 2007, the plaintiff allegedly fell while ascending a two-step exterior staircase located at a private home in Bay Ridge. Prior to her fall, the plaintiff frequently visited this home to care for its elderly owner and resident, Kalliope Pantelides (hereinafter the decedent). In 2008, the plaintiff commenced this action against the decedent. The decedent died during the pendency of the action and the administrators of her estate were substituted as the defendants. Thereafter, the Supreme Court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the plaintiffs deposition testimony, in which she was unable to identify the cause of her accident without engaging in speculation (see Rizos v Galini Seafood Rest., 89 AD3d 1004 [2011]; Thompson v Commack Multiplex Cinemas, 83 AD3d 929, 930 [2011]; Reiff v Beechwood Browns Rd. Bldg. Corp., 54 AD3d 1015, 1015 [2008]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Dillon, J.E, Balkin, Dickerson and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Reiff v. Beechwood Browns Road Building Corp.
54 A.D.3d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Thompson v. Commack Multiplex Cinemas
83 A.D.3d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Rizos v. Galini Seafood Restaurant
89 A.D.3d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 841, 961 N.Y.S.2d 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsikis-v-pantelides-nyappdiv-2013.