T.S.G. v. T.P.

Missouri Court of Appeals

T.S.G. v. T.P.

452 S.W.3d 267, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 7, 2015 WL 164214

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 13, 2015

DocketNo. ED 100634

StatusPublished

This text of 452 S.W.3d 267 (T.S.G. v. T.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T.S.G. v. T.P., 452 S.W.3d 267, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 7, 2015 WL 164214 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

T.P. appeals pro se from the trial court’s judgment granting a full order of protection against her, pursuant to Missouri’s Adult Abuse Act, sections 455.010 through 455.090, R.S.Mo. (2000).

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

T.P. appeals pro se from the trial court’s judgment granting a full order of protection against her, pursuant to Missouri’s Adult Abuse Act, sections 455.010 through 455.090, R.S.Mo. (2000).

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

452 S.W.3d 267, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 7, 2015 WL 164214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsg-v-tp-moctapp-2015.