TSEVIS v. Rourke

344 S.W.3d 842, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 725, 2011 WL 2139804

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Peter Tsevis and Peter Enterprises, Inc. appeals the grant of partial summary judgment in favor of John W. Rourke, Thomas J. Niemann, and Reinert & Rourke, P.C. (collectively referred to as “Attorneys”) and a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Attorneys and Christopher Tsevis and CRT Businesses, LLC (collectively referred to as “Defendants”). We find that the trial court did not err in granting partial summary judgment in favor of Attorneys, and the court did not err in entering judgment upon the jury verdict in favor of Defendants.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).