Tseng v. St. Luke's Hospital Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tseng v. St. Luke's Hospital Center

56 A.D.2d 548, 391 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10553

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 548 (Tseng v. St. Luke's Hospital Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tseng v. St. Luke's Hospital Center, 56 A.D.2d 548, 391 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10553 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 17, 1976, unanimously modified, on the law, to strike Item 19 from the demand for a bill of particulars, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The stricken item seeks the source of information and ground for belief that plaintiff’s injuries resulted from defendant’s negligence. Patently this asks for evidence, probably that of experts, and certainly the product of work in preparation for trial. The others, though many in number, are not overburdensome: as to those of which plaintiff has no information, that lack may be stated, with a supplemental bill to follow after knowledge is acquired. A bill of particulars in accordance with the foregoing shall be furnished within 30 days following service of the order to be entered hereon. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Silverman, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 17, 1976, unanimously modified, on the law, to strike Item 19 from the demand for a bill of particulars, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The stricken item seeks the source of information and ground for belief that plaintiff’s injuries resulted from defendant’s negligence. Patently this asks for evidence, probably that of experts, and certainly the product of work in preparation for trial. The others, though many in number, are not overburdensome: as to those of which plaintiff has no information, that lack may be stated, with a supplemental bill to follow after knowledge is acquired. A bill of particulars in accordance with the foregoing shall be furnished within 30 days following service of the order to be entered hereon. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Silverman, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 548, 391 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tseng-v-st-lukes-hospital-center-nyappdiv-1977.