Tschida v. Commissioner
This text of 57 F. App'x 715 (Tschida v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Perry Tschida appeals the tax court’s1 dismissal of his amended petition for a lien or levy action under I.R.C. § 6320(c) or § 6330(d). Our de novo review persuades us that Tschida’s petition was untimely filed. See I.R.C. §§ 6330(d)(1), 7502; Bue-ford v. Resolution Trust Corp., 991 F.2d 481, 484 (8th Cir.1993) (standard of review). Because the untimely filing de[716]*716prived the tax court of jurisdiction, and because the court may consider its jurisdiction on its own motion, we conclude that the tax court properly dismissed the petition. See Commissioner v. McCoy, 484 U.S. 3, 7, 108 S.Ct. 217, 98 L.Ed.2d 2 (1987) (per curiam); Bueford, 991 F.2d at 485; Raymond v. Commissioner, No 2354-01L, 2002 WL 31371975, 2002 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 48 at *5 & n. 3 (T.C. Oct. 22, 2002).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F. App'x 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tschida-v-commissioner-ca8-2003.