Tschamler v. Kelley

482 A.2d 465, 1984 Me. LEXIS 793
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedOctober 5, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 482 A.2d 465 (Tschamler v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tschamler v. Kelley, 482 A.2d 465, 1984 Me. LEXIS 793 (Me. 1984).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

The Defendant appeals from an order of Superior Court, Kennebec County, affirming a judgment of the District Court, Augusta, in an action in which the Plaintiff recovered judgment from him for a brokerage commission on the rental of certain property in Randolph.

The record contains no evidence on the issue of whether the Plaintiff was a duly licensed real estate broker and the Defendant did not raise the issue in his answer or at trial. The Court is evenly divided on the question whether proof of a valid broker’s license is an essential element of the Plaintiff’s case by virtue of 32 M.R.S.A. § 4116 or whether absence of such a license must be raised as an affirmative defense pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 8(e). Accordingly, the entry is:

By an evenly divided Court judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New England Hotel Realty, Inc. v. Finley
508 A.2d 121 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
482 A.2d 465, 1984 Me. LEXIS 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tschamler-v-kelley-me-1984.